From TV to TikTok: Why News Networks Are Losing Control
In January 2026, the Spanish-language network Univision announced the layoff of between 200 and 250 employees in its Miami offices. This represents about 6% of its workforce and is part of a restructuring plan announced by its executives. The official reason was a response to “difficult times” and financial results below expectations. The company also mentioned changes in its digital, entertainment, and news divisions.
Shortly before this, its parent company, TelevisaUnivision, had already made staff cuts and leadership changes. Several teams were eliminated, and the global news structure between the United States and Mexico was reorganized.
These layoffs are not isolated events. They are part of a broader situation in which the traditional media industry is facing major declines in audience, advertising revenue, and public trust. This leads to fewer resources for serious and investigative journalism.
Why are traditional news programs in crisis?
1. Loss of interest in traditional news
In recent years, studies have shown that audiences who used to watch traditional television are moving quickly to digital platforms and social media for news.
For example, research from the Reuters Institute found that in the United States, more people now use platforms like Facebook, X, and YouTube to get news than traditional broadcast television.
This shift happens for several reasons:
- Speed and access: News on social media appears in real time. People do not have to wait for a scheduled news program.
- On-demand viewing: Users can choose what to watch, when to watch it, and how to watch it.
- Better format for mobile: Short videos and simple text work better on phones.
2. Perception of bias and lack of objectivity
A major problem for traditional television is the perception of bias.
Many viewers feel that news programs do not only present facts. Instead, they present opinions or political perspectives. This reduces trust.
Critics often say that some segments are not pure news but opinions presented as facts. This weakens the credibility of media companies.
Controversial editorial decisions have also increased this perception. For example, Univision faced criticism after airing an interview with former president Donald Trump. Some viewers believed the interview showed political favoritism.
As a result, many people feel that media companies are not serving the public interest, but instead shaping narratives that match corporate or political goals.
3. Budget cuts and weaker journalism
As advertising revenue declines and audiences leave traditional TV, companies reduce costs.
This leads to:
- Fewer journalists
- Less investigative reporting
- More simple and low-cost content
Instead of deep reporting, many programs rely on opinion panels, repeated content, or sensational topics.
The result is clear: less serious journalism and more entertainment presented as news. This creates a cycle of lower trust and lower interest.
The rise of social media as a source of information
Social media has become a central part of the global information system.
Platforms like TikTok, X, Instagram, and YouTube are now used not only for entertainment, but also for news, live events, and direct access to sources.
Advantages for users:
- Speed: Immediate access to information
- Variety of voices: People can follow independent journalists, analysts, or eyewitnesses
- Modern format: Short and interactive content fits younger audiences
But there are also risks:
- More misinformation: There is no consistent editorial filter
- Fragmented reality: People no longer share a single version of events, but many competing narratives
Social consequences of the crisis in traditional news
1. General distrust
Recent surveys show that trust in traditional media is very low. Less than 30% of U.S. adults say they trust mass media.
Many people see social media as more “authentic,” even if it is not always accurate.
2. Increased polarization
Social media platforms use algorithms that show users content similar to what they already believe.
This creates information bubbles and reduces exposure to different opinions.
3. Less investment in investigative journalism
Budget cuts mean fewer investigations and more superficial coverage.
This reduces the ability of media to report on complex and important issues.
The decision to lay off hundreds of workers at Univision, along with changes at Telemundo, should not be seen as isolated business actions.
They are a clear sign of a deep crisis in traditional television news.
This crisis is driven by:
- Loss of audience
- Growing perception of bias
- Migration to social media
At the same time, traditional media are struggling to adapt.
Their role as trusted sources is being questioned, and their difficulty competing with fast digital formats is changing how people consume news.
This transformation does not only affect journalists.
It also changes how entire societies understand the world.
About the Author
