The Fall of a Narrative: Ana Pardo de Vera Shifts Stance on Her Sister’s Case

Ana Pardo de Vera: From Unconditional Defense to Acceptance of Possible Criminal Involvement

1. A Shift in Her Public Discourse

Ana Pardo de Vera, journalist and regular commentator, has significantly changed her stance regarding her sister Isabel Pardo de Vera, former president of Adif, charged in the Koldo case with crimes including embezzlement, bribery, influence peddling, malfeasance, and membership in a criminal organization.

While her defense was initially firm and unwavering, recently, in a viral interview shared by Pedro Otamendi, she no longer claims that her sister has not committed any illegalities, also acknowledging that the crimes charged are “very serious.”

2. From Visceral Defense to Institutional Acceptance

In March 2024, during a debate with PP representative Ana Vázquez on “Todo es mentira,” Ana reacted harshly upon hearing her sister’s name:

“Don’t you dare mention my sister and try to involve her in these issues… You have to be miserable.”

During 2024 and 2025, her discourse focused on denying any involvement on the part of Isabel, calling the investigations a “political and media hunt.” She even said:

“I would defend her even if she were Pablo Escobar or Marcial Dorado.”

This phrase generated significant controversy when she compared her loyalty to figures linked to organized crime, which was interpreted as trivializing the case.

3. Clashes and Criticism

Pardo de Vera engaged in several clashes with journalists such as Vito Quiles and Bertrand Ndongo, whom she publicly insulted, which was harshly criticized as a loss of professional control. Her visceral reaction in defense of her sister set the tone for her interventions until mid-2025.

4. The Turning Point

On July 10, 2025, upon her return to Todo es mentira after several weeks of absence, her message changed:

“If she falls, I’ll die, but I’ll have to tell the tale.”

With that statement, she acknowledged for the first time that, as a journalist, she is obligated to report, even if it concerns her own family. Although she maintains her personal support, she has begun to differentiate between affection and institutional recognition of the seriousness of the judicial process.

5. The Chronology of Change

Date Statement Tone
March 2024 “Don’t you dare mention my sister…” Denial
April 2025 Justifies chats with Koldo as technical clarifications Defensive
July 2025 “If she falls, I’ll die, but I’ll have to tell the tale” Reflective
July 2025 No longer denies possible illegalities Acceptance

6. Judicial Context: The Facts That Underlie the Case

The National Court charges Isabel Pardo de Vera for participating in an alleged corruption network linked to former PSOE advisor Koldo García. In April 2025, messages emerged in which Koldo asked for favors regarding public procurement; Isabel, according to Ana, responded by explaining the procedure without directly intervening.

7. Conclusion: An Evolving Position

Ana Pardo de Vera’s public career reflects a transformation from a clear-eyed emotional defense to a nuanced position, where she acknowledges the seriousness of the case and the possibility of her sister’s involvement. This evolution not only reflects a personal change, but also the complex tension between family ties and the professional and ethical principles of journalism.

The journalist no longer denies possible crimes committed by her sister Isabel Pardo de Vera, who is charged by the National Court. The resolute defense has given way to a more nuanced position, although the emotional connection remains.
The shift: “She no longer says that her sister didn’t do anything illegal”

Journalist and talk show host Ana Pardo de Vera has made a significant shift in her discourse regarding the Koldo case in recent months, which directly implicates her sister Isabel Pardo de Vera, former president of Adif, who is being investigated for embezzlement, bribery, influence peddling, malfeasance, and membership in a criminal organization.

In a viral interview shared on social media by journalist Pedro Otamendi, Ana stops insisting on her sister’s innocence. “She no longer says that her sister didn’t do anything illegal,” Otamendi wrote on X, summing up the change in tone. Ana herself acknowledges that the crimes under investigation “are very serious.”
From Visceral Defense to Institutional Recognition

Throughout 2024 and much of 2025, Pardo de Vera maintained a public stance of total defense, even to the point of extremes. One of her most controversial statements was:

“I would defend her even if she were Pablo Escobar or Marcial Dorado.”

With this, the journalist sought to convey unconditional personal loyalty. However, the comparison with organized crime figures drew strong criticism and was interpreted as trivializing the case.
Tensions on and off set

Ana also engaged in television confrontations and arguments with journalists. In March 2024, she confronted Congresswoman Ana Vázquez on Todo es mentira for mentioning her sister:

“Don’t you dare involve my sister in these matters. You have to be miserable.”

She also clashed off set. She clashed with reporters such as Vito Quiles and Bertrand Ndongo, whom she directly insulted. These scenes circulated on social media, sparking a debate about her attitude and professionalism. The Turning Point: July 2025

The change in discourse was consolidated on July 10, 2025, upon her return to the program Todo es mentira (Everything is a Lie) after several weeks out of the media spotlight. Ana explained that her absence was not due to evasion, but for personal reasons, and made it clear that if she had compromising information about her sister, she would make it public:

“If she falls, I’ll die, but I’ll have to tell it.”

For the first time, her discourse opens up to acknowledging possible real involvement, although without abandoning emotional support.
The Case: What is Isabel Pardo de Vera accused of?

The National Court is investigating Isabel Pardo de Vera for her alleged participation in the corruption network linked to Koldo García, former advisor to José Luis Ábalos. Among the evidence is messages in which Koldo requests “favors” related to public contracts. Ana maintains that her sister “only explained the procedure,” without directly intervening. Timeline of a Change
Date Notable Statement Dominant Tone
March 2024 “Don’t you dare mention my sister…” Outright denial
April 2025 Justifies chats with Koldo as technical explanations Defensive
July 2025 “If she falls, I’ll die, but I’ll have to tell the tale.” Reflective
July 2025 No longer denies possible illegalities; admits the seriousness of the case Acceptance
Journalism or family protection?

Ana Pardo de Vera’s media career in relation to the case shows a constant tension between family ties and journalistic duty. What began as a staunch defense has evolved into a more nuanced and professional discourse, in which she acknowledges that no one is above public scrutiny.

This shift leaves a question in the air:
How will she act if the crimes charged against her sister are confirmed?